Blended Learning in Higher Education: A Review of Successful Models
Keywords:
Blended learning, Higher education, Instructional design, Educational technology, Online learning, Pedagogical modelsAbstract
Objective: The objective of this study was to systematically review successful blended learning models in higher education and identify the key components influencing their design, implementation, and educational outcomes.
Methods and Materials: This qualitative review employed thematic analysis. Data were collected through a systematic literature review of 12 scholarly articles on blended learning published in the past decade. Articles were coded and analyzed using Nvivo 14 software through an inductive approach until theoretical saturation was reached. Selection criteria included a focus on higher education, evidence-based successful models, and availability of full-text data.
Findings: Analysis revealed three major themes: (1) instructional design and pedagogical models, (2) technological and infrastructural factors, and (3) outcomes and impacts of blended learning. The first theme highlighted the importance of interactive design, content alignment, and innovative teaching strategies. The second emphasized the role of technical infrastructure, digital literacy, and data security in sustainable implementation. The third showed that blended learning improves learning quality, enhances 21st-century skills, and increases student satisfaction and engagement.
Conclusion: Blended learning in higher education proves most effective when pedagogical, technological, and organizational dimensions are balanced. Interactive instructional design, continuous technical support, and institutional culture building are essential for successful implementation. The findings provide practical insights for policymakers, educators, and academic institutions aiming to design sustainable blended learning environments.
Downloads
References
Alammary, A., Sheard, J., & Carbone, A. (2019). Blended learning in higher education: Three different design approaches. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 35(5), 1–14.
Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Schmid, R. F., Tamim, R. M., & Abrami, P. C. (2014). A meta-analysis of blended learning and technology use in higher education: From the general to the applied. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 26(1), 87–122.
Boelens, R., De Wever, B., & Voet, M. (2018). Four key challenges to the design of blended learning: A systematic literature review. Educational Research Review, 22, 1–18.
Boelens, R., Van Laer, S., De Wever, B., & Elen, J. (2020). Blended learning in COVID-19 times: Experiences and lessons learned. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(4), 1433–1448.
Bond, M., Bedenlier, S., Marín, V. I., & Händel, M. (2021). Emergency remote teaching in higher education: Mapping the first global online semester. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 2, 100017.
Drysdale, J. S., Graham, C. R., Spring, K. J., & Halverson, L. R. (2016). An analysis of research trends in dissertations and theses studying blended learning. Internet and Higher Education, 17, 90–100.
Dziuban, C., Graham, C. R., Moskal, P., Norberg, A., & Sicilia, N. (2018). Blended learning: The new normal and emerging technologies. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(1), 1–16.
Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. Internet and Higher Education, 7(2), 95–105.
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2010). The community of inquiry framework: Origins, developments, and future directions. Internet and Higher Education, 13(1–2), 5–9.
